On certain means of proof in the trial. Book 2

The successful conduct of any court case implies the high activity of participants in the trial and, above all, in the process of carrying out evidence. The positive result of the consideration of the dispute, for which cannot be neglected from the completeness and sufficiency of the evidence base formed in the case, is completely neglected for any evidence. questions related to the use of various, sometimes very specific means of proof.

since the list of possible tools for proof is not exhausted only by those methods that are expressly provided for by the procedural law, the trial participants should try to extract the maximum benefit from any possible sources, from where valuable information can be drawn.

In this book, we decided to analyze and summarize the practice of applying in civil matters such means of proving a private detective and a “secret” buyer, concluding a psychophysical study from the use of a polygraph, Reviews, the results of operational-search activities, including protocols of interrogation of witnesses in criminal cases, a decision on recognition by victims in a criminal case, as well as judicial acts with a missed term for compulsory execution.

A separate consideration in the book received questions, related to the choice of the type of examination conducted in the case, given that the determination of the value of property is possible both within the framework of the construction and technical and evaluative examination, as well as a legal assessment of information on the intersection of the state border of the Russian Federation from the point of view of their objective possibility of committing a legally significant significant The period of various civil transactions.